Not logged in
  
 
Home
 
 Marriott's Living Annuity Portfolios 
 Create
Portfolio
 
 View
Funds
 
 Compare
Funds
 
 Rank
Funds
 
Login
E-mail     Print
Coronation Bond Fund  |  South African-Interest Bearing-Variable Term
14.1956    -0.0697    (-0.489%)
NAV price (ZAR) Fri 4 Oct 2024 (change prev day)


Coronation Bond comment - Sep 18 - Fund Manager Comment19 Dec 2018
Emerging markets and South African fixed income markets managed to keep their heads above water this quarter, but the water wasn't calm. Local bonds produced a negative return in US dollar terms, in large part due to the poor performance of the rand. The local currency fell victim to a broader sell-off in emerging market currencies, which was driven in large part by the sell-off in the Turkish lira and Argentinian peso.

South Africa didn't differentiate itself during the quarter. Economic conditions worsened, with growth materialising below both our and market expectations (-0.7% versus 0.9% expected), which pushed the economy into technical recession. In the context of the weaker emerging markets backdrop, South Africa did not fare well, as is evident by the poor performance of the currency over the quarter. But South Africa's problems are by no means as severe as those of Turkey and Argentina. Once the panic eased, both the rand and local bonds recouped some of their losses. The All bond index (ALBI) was up 0.8% in the quarter, which was slightly behind cash (1.7%) as the longer end of the curve (maturity longer than 12 years) underperformed the rest of the bond curve. Concerns about growth, the implications for tax revenue and further bailout for SOEs weighed on the fiscal outcomes, which led to this underperformance. Inflation-linked bonds have continued to fare poorly, with returns of 0.5% for the quarter and 0.9% over the last year, well behind cash (6.9%) and the ALBI (7.1%).

The euphoria of the first quarter has quickly faded as policy uncertainty remains a key obstacle to South Africa's recovery. Policy trajectory and the intentions of policymakers have moved in the right direction, however, uncertainty around land expropriation without compensation (EWC) and mining regulations have impeded the translation of confidence into actual spending. Towards, the end of the quarter, a new, more acceptable version of the Mining Charter was released, which should ease concerns from the local mining sector. However, in order to see an increase in consumption spending, currently contracting quarter on quarter, more clarity on EWC is required. Given the current rhetoric from policymakers, this should be resolved over the next couple of quarters, which will then help with a faster recovery in growth in 2019.

Despite the depreciation in the currency and rise in the oil price, forecasts for inflation still remain contained. Inflation is expected to stay in the target band over the next 2-3 years and only near the top end of the band in the first half of 2019. The recent SARB rhetoric has indicated an eagerness to raise interest rates, which seems puzzling given the subdued growth and inflation outlook. Our expectations are for rates to remain flat until the second half of 2019. In addition, concerns around a blowout in South Africa's fiscal deficit and implications for a further credit downgrade (which would trigger an exit from the Citi World Government Bond Index), are overdone. The economic assumptions behind the February budget still hold and while revenue has underperformed this year, this has been matched (if not exceeded) by expenditure underruns, which place less pressure on the fiscus and allow Moody's to keep us in investment grade at least until the second half of 2019. Thus the local environment for South African government bonds remains quite supportive.

The change in risk sentiment and the global monetary policy will continue to pose a risk to emerging market sentiment and asset performance. This by implication suggests that there might be further downside to holding local government bonds. As long-term investors, we focus on the valuation of underlying assets relative to fundamentals and whether current valuation provides our client portfolios with a sufficient margin of safety in the event of short-term volatility or adverse price movements. The major choice facing local bond investors is whether to be invested in cash or bonds.

A three-year breakeven analysis of the 12-year and 26-year government bonds, i.e. how much yields could sell off before the return on the government bonds equate to cash (assuming a flat rate of 6.5%), does provide comfort for holders of local government bonds relative to cash. It shows the longer end of the government bond curve offers better value at current levels. It requires a similar magnitude of basis-point movement for both the 12-year and 26-year bond to breakeven relative to cash. In addition, if one is more positive on bond yields (as we will show below), then holding a 26-year fixed rate bond will provide a greater total return than a 12-year government bond, since it trades at a higher yield and has a higher modified duration (capital at risk measure).

In addition to the above analysis, one must ensure that current levels of valuation provide an attractive entry point and a decent margin of safety against an adverse movement in the event the fundamental backdrop deteriorates due to any "black swan" type events.

The main takeaways are firstly that given our base case assumptions of a 3.25% US 10- year rate, 5% South African inflation, 2% US inflation and a steady South African credit spread, bonds are currently cheap. Secondly, even if our worst-case scenario were to play out over the next two years, local government bonds would at worst provide a cash-type return (12y bond yields can move to 10.13% before it underperforms cash+1%).

The next thing one has to decide is whether one should be allocating any bond investments towards inflation-linked bonds (ILBs) in order to provide some diversification and inflation protection to the portfolio. One would only hold inflation-linked bonds which have a breakeven inflation of less than 6%, given the SARB is an inflation-targeting central bank that has never allowed inflation to average more than 6% over any extended period. Therefore, any longer ILB (maturity >= 12y) does not offer value relative to its nominal bond counterpart. However, a case can be made for shorter-date ILB's, where implied breakeven inflation is around 5.5% with real yields of close > 2.5%. In this case, the shorter date ILB offers an attractive pickup relative to the real policy rate (currently at 1-1.5%) and provides one with a "free protection" in the event inflation moves closer to the top end of the band over the next 2-3y.

Recent economic releases have suggested that the local economy is taking much longer than initially anticipated to move onto a sustainable growth path. South Africa's longer-term growth prospects are being dimmed by shorter-term uncertainty on key policies. Policy pronouncements more recently have signaled policymakers' intention for a more market-friendly outcome, which should put growth back on an upward trajectory. Local inflation should remain within the target band, even after the recent selloff in the ZAR and rally in the oil price. Local government bonds provide an attractive return relative to cash, compare favourably relative to their EM peer group and offer decent margin of safety against a shorter-term deterioration in fundamentals. At current levels, the yields on offer in the local bond market are attractive relative to their underlying fundamentals and warrant a neutral to overweight allocation.
Coronation Bond comment - Jun 18 - Fund Manager Comment14 Sep 2018
What a difference a few months make. By the end of the first quarter of 2018, the world was in a happy place. Emerging markets were forging ahead, generating bond returns of 4.4% and equity returns of 1.4% (both in US dollar terms), and synchronous global growth was the rising tide that would lift all boats. Fast forward to the end of the second quarter and tears of disappointment are rolling down the faces of most emerging market investors. The sweet nectar that enticed and fuelled an insatiable hunger for yield in developing markets started to sour towards the end of April. Emerging market assets tumbled, spurred on by concerns of an overheating US economy and fears around the escalation of a US/China trade war, in turn fuelling a rally in the US dollar. This resulted in emerging market bonds and equities losing between 8% and 10% in the second quarter of 2018, bringing their dollar returns for the year to date to -6.44% and -6.60%, respectively.

The spirit of 'Ramaphoria' that prevailed during the first quarter of 2018 lost its momentum. In part, this was driven by disappointing growth data and a slowdown in the pace of policy reform implementation. Coupled with the souring global environment for emerging markets, this resulted in the All Bond Index (ALBI) falling 3.8% in the second quarter of 2018, bringing its return year-to-date to 4% (marginally ahead of cash at 3.4), but maintaining a solid double-digit return of 10.2% for the 12-month period. The South African 10-year government bond benchmark yield rose by almost 1% to 8.84% at the end of June (from its first quarter closing level of 7.98%), touching an intra-quarter high of 9.15%. The liquidation of bond holdings by foreigners resulted in a substantial swing in net bond flows, moving from a year-to-date net inflow figure of R17.6 billion (at 31 March 2018) to a net outflow of R35.6 billion (at end-June 2018). This had a significant impact on the exchange rate, with the rand weakening by 13.7% over the quarter.

The local economy has endured an extended period of underperformance relative to global markets and its peers in the emerging market universe. More recently, many of South Africa's self-imposed obstacles have started to show signs of clearing. Inflation remains at a cyclical low and should not exceed the top end of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) target band (3% to 6%) over the next 12 to 24 months. In fact, current inflation expectations are closer to 5% than 6%, according to the latest Bureau for Economic Research Inflation Expectations Survey. Growth numbers for the first quarter of 2018 surprised materially to the downside (-2.2% quarter on quarter and 0.8% year on year), calling into question the realism of the 'Ramaphoria' effect. This implies that the SARB has room to provide more cyclical support to the local economy by further easing the repo rate; however, considering the recent rout in emerging markets, the worst-case outcome is that the repo rate remains stable for at least the next 6 to 12 months. On the growth front, although most recent data are cause for concern, real consumer income growth will be closer to 2% this year, allowing for an additional recovery in consumer spending, which makes up about 60% of GDP. Long-term growth prospects will rely on an increase in fixed investment into the local economy, which can only be realised in a certain and transparent policy environment. The conditions thereof have been partially met with the new administrative team in government and newly announced policy reforms - although these reforms are likely to be implemented at a much slower pace than suggested at the start of the year. This leaves the South African economy in a very favourable position relative to its peer group, with growth heading higher and inflation being stable (or lower), thereby creating a supportive environment for local bonds.

Despite the positive local backdrop for South African bonds, the global environment has become unsympathetic as global monetary policy accommodation continues to be wound down. As such, the price one pays for South African government bonds should encapsulate a decent margin of safety to weather short-term market volatility. There are two key measures through which to assess the value in local bond markets; first, by comparing the implied real yields of local government bonds relative to their emerging market counterparts as well as their own history, and secondly, by establishing whether current yields provide a sufficient margin of safety should one of the key underlying drivers (the one that is currently most at risk) experience an abrupt, adverse move.

In the graph and table below we compare the implied real yield of the South African 10-year benchmark to its history and relative to its emerging market peers. We arrive at the implied 10-year real yield by adjusting the nominal 10-year yield for the average actual realised inflation over the two years after the observation point (we use a combination of market and internal forecasts for those periods where this is not available).

As an example, a nominal 10-year yield of 9.04% at 29 June 2018, adjusted by an expected inflation average of 5.1% over the next two years, implies a real yield of 3.46%. Two things are clear from this exercise. First, the current level of real yields in South Africa is attractive relative to history. The graph below shows that real yields are sitting above their 10-year average and are as high as they were during previous times of locally driven economic and political stress. Secondly, relative to our emerging market peer group, South Africa flags as one of the cheapest stable emerging markets, both from a real and nominal yield perspective. We remind readers that both Brazil and Turkey are at very different points in their respective business cycles to South Africa and are going through a period of unsettling economic and political stresses. Therefore the relative valuation of South African government bonds seems relatively cheap.

To arrive at a fair value for South African government bonds, one must take into consideration the following three things: the level of the global risk-free rate; the inflation differential between South Africa and the rest of the world; and a credit spread that quantifies the inherent risk in South Africa as an issuer among emerging markets.

We can objectively say that the current level of the South African 10-year bond is 9.04%, the global risk-free rate is 2.86% (US 10-year) and the inflation differential is sitting at 3% (local inflation of 5% and US inflation of 2%). This implies a credit spread of 318 basis points (bps) for South African government bonds. The graph below shows the average credit spread for BBB (investment grade) and BB (first rung of sub investment grade) borrowers. It must be noted that South Africa has a split credit rating, with Fitch and Standard & Poor's holding a sub investment grade rating while Moody's holds an investment grade rating for South Africa. The current level of the average credit spread in the graph below is 270 bps, with a long-term average (the black dashed line) of 300 bps. We conclude from these observations that South Africa trades quite cheaply relative to its peer group. Even if credit spreads were to normalise further as global monetary policy conditions tighten to long-term averages, the country's current credit spread provides sufficient room for a cushion against this normalisation, given that it currently trades well above the long-term peer group average.

Foreign flows into the local bond market garner a great deal of attention due to their magnitude, but they do not form part of the foundation of our investment case for bonds. We focus on the pricing of risk rather than the psychology surrounding risk. Nonetheless, looking at the trends does provide some insights. The current level of outflows, on a rolling 12-month basis, is equivalent to the level of outflows that the bond market experienced during the period May to June 2013 (the 'taper tantrum') and in the aftermath of 9 December 2015 ('Nenegate'). There are two key observations to be made from the graph below:

Foreign flows in/out of the local bond market are generally driven by momentum (buying as the market becomes more expensive, or selling as it becomes cheaper), making them a bad indicator of future market performance.

Given the degree of selling that has been experienced over the last 12 months (more specifically in the last 3 months), positioning seems a great deal cleaner (that is, not biased to a sell-off or rally in markets). This further suggests that big moves going forward are more likely to be valuation based rather than sentiment/positioning based. This further adds credit to our assertion that from current levels, bond yields are more likely to compress (bond rally) than widen (bond sell-off).

South Africa has made the mistake of looking through rose-tinted glasses for the better part of this year, with asset prices reflecting a much too optimistic outlook for local economic developments. The recent economic disappointments on growth have been a stark reminder of the local economic reality against a global backdrop that has turned more treacherous for emerging markets. South Africa's underlying economy remains in a better place relative to history and to its peer group. Inflation is expected to remain stable and well contained, while growth will continue to move higher. Local bonds have now adjusted to reflect realistic expectations for the local economy and the more unfriendly global environment. South African bonds compare favourably to their emerging market peers relative to their own history, and offer a decent cushion against further global policy normalisation. At current levels, the yields on offer in the local bond market are attractive relative to their underlying fundamentals and warrant a neutral to overweight allocation.
Archive Year
2023 2022 2021 |  2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002